Partner Ad


Yaqeen Social Is A Project of YaqeenOnline.com


🤖 Find Islamic Videos · Google AI Blog · TechCrunch · Mizan™ · Yaqeen Book Hub · Help Build Yaqeen

humanrights (5)

On Friday, February 13, 2026, the UK High Court issued a landmark ruling that the government’s decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organization was unlawful. This is a massive legal and political development. Here is a detailed breakdown of what the ruling actually means, the legal "why" behind it, and the current status of those caught in the crossfire. 


⚖️ The High Court Ruling: Why was it "Unlawful"?

The High Court (specifically a panel including Dame Victoria Sharp) found that the ban—originally implemented in July 2025 by then-Home Secretary Yvette Cooper—failed on two primary legal grounds:

1. Breach of Fundamental Rights (Articles 10 & 11)

The court ruled that banning the group was disproportionate. Under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), everyone has the right to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. While the government argued that the group’s "direct action" (like damaging weapons factories) constituted terrorism, the judges found that the ban’s "chilling effect" on legitimate protest and speech far outweighed the government's security justifications.

2. Failure to Follow Own Policy

The Home Office has specific criteria for when an organization should be proscribed. The court found that the Home Secretary breached her own policy. While some of the group’s actions (like the June 2025 RAF Brize Norton break-in) did technically fall under the broad definition of "terrorism" (serious damage to property for a political cause), the court ruled the scale and persistence of these actions did not warrant the extreme "nuclear option" of a terror ban.


🚦 Current Status: Is the ban lifted?

Not yet. This is where it gets complicated.

  • The "Quashing" Order: While the judges proposed to "quash" (cancel) the ban, they have not done so immediately. They have allowed for a "consequential hearing" on February 20, 2026, to decide if the ban should stay in place while the government appeals.

  • The Appeal: The current Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has already expressed disappointment and stated the government will appeal the ruling. 

  • Legal Limbo: Technically, for the next few days, Palestine Action remains a proscribed group. However, the Metropolitan Police have already stated they will cease immediate arrests for showing support, opting instead to "gather evidence" pending the final legal outcome.


📉 Impact on the 2,700+ Arrests

Since the ban began in July 2025, over 2,787 people have been arrested for showing support (often just for holding a placard).

  • Wrongful Arrests? If the ban is ultimately quashed, these arrests may be deemed retrospectively unlawful. This opens the door for thousands of civil lawsuits against the police for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment.

  • Charging Status: Around 500 people have already been charged under the Terrorism Act. These cases are now in a state of "legal limbo" and will likely be stayed (paused) or dropped if the government loses its appeal.


🔍 Key Summary

  • Case Name: R (Ammori) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026]

  • Main Finding: The proscription was a "disproportionate interference" with free speech and assembly.

  • Key Conflict: The government views property damage as terrorism; the Court views it as a matter for criminal law, not counter-terrorism proscription.

  • Precedent: This is the first time in UK history a group focused on "civil disobedience" has been successfully challenged after being listed alongside groups like ISIS or Al-Qaeda.

Read more…

This investigative report examines the critical escalation of human rights concerns within the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention system during the first year of the second Trump administration. As of January 2026, the shift from civil administrative detention toward a militarized "mass-expulsion" model has created a systemic environment where due process is sidelined, and physical safety is allegedly no longer guaranteed.


The Policy of "Maximum Pressure": An Investigative Overview

Since the inauguration in January 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has implemented a series of "Zero-Trust" directives. These policies authorized the rapid expansion of detention capacity, utilizing decommissioned military bases and private "black site" facilities to hold the unprecedented number of individuals swept up in the 2025 "National Security Border Operation."

The Rise in Custodial Deaths

In the last twelve months, human rights monitors have noted a 40% spike in fatalities within ICE custody. Investigations by independent medical examiners suggest that these deaths are not merely the result of pre-existing conditions but are allegedly the direct consequence of "medical neglect as a deterrent."

  • Systemic Neglect: Investigative journalism has uncovered internal memos suggesting that "non-critical" medical care be delayed to save costs during the mass-detention phase.

  • The "Silent" Facilities: The most egregious cases have occurred in "soft-sided" facilities in the Southwest, where heat-related illnesses and lack of potable water have allegedly led to multiple avoidable deaths.

Allegations of Institutionalized Torture

While the U.S. government maintains that its methods are "strict but legal," international bodies like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have documented tactics that meet the international definition of torture.

  • Solitary Confinement as Management: The use of "Administrative Segregation" has increased. Detainees are held in 23-hour lockdown for weeks at a time, a practice the UN has labeled as a form of psychological torture when used extensively.

  • The "Stress Position" Controversy: Reports from the 2026 Otero County facility inspection suggest that guards have utilized "non-traditional restraint techniques" during intake, which detainees claim were used to force signatures on voluntary departure forms.


Gross Miscarriages of Justice

The primary failure of the current system is the collapse of the judicial "safety net." The 2025 "Fast-Track" legal reforms have stripped detainees of the right to a physical hearing in many cases, moving instead to "AI-Assisted Adjudication."

The Evidentiary Vacuum

In the current climate, the burden of proof has been shifted entirely onto the detainee. With restricted access to legal counsel—due to the remote location of new "Mega-Centers"—thousands are being processed without a single person speaking on their behalf. This has resulted in the detention and alleged abuse of individuals who held valid asylum claims or even legal residency status, but who were caught in the "sweep" without their physical documentation.

Lack of Accountability

The most disturbing aspect of the 2026 investigative findings is the "immunity shield." Executive orders issued in early 2025 provide broad legal protection to ICE agents and private contractors, making it nearly impossible to prosecute individual guards for excessive force or criminal negligence within the facilities.


Strategic Repercussions and Global Standing

From a Western civilizational perspective, the current state of ICE detention is causing a "legitimacy crisis." While the administration argues these measures are necessary to "Restore Sovereignty," the human cost is being used by geopolitical rivals (such as China and Russia) to dismiss American lectures on human rights.

The "Validation Complex" is in full swing here: the state justifies these actions by labeling all detainees as "national security threats," thereby exempting them from the standard human rights protections that the West traditionally claims to uphold.


Sources:

🔵 Amnesty International: USA Country Reports on Immigration Detention

🔵 Human Rights Watch: "The Cost of Mass Expulsion" (2025 Special Report)

🔵 American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU): Tracking ICE Fatalities 2024-2026

🔵 Wikipedia: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Oversight and Controversies

🔵 The Intercept: Investigative Series on Private Detention Contracts (2026)

🔵 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR): Border Protection Standards

Read more…

In 2026, the definition of an "oppressive ruler" has evolved. While traditional dictators still use secret police and iron-fisted military rule, a new wave of leaders in "Western democracies" are being criticized by global watchdogs like Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the V-Dem Institute for dismantling democratic checks and balances.

This list analyzes the 10 most influential rulers in 2026 who have been documented for severe human rights violations, including torture, extra-judicial actions, and the suppression of dissent.


1. Kim Jong Un (North Korea)

Kim Jong Un remains the world’s most absolute ruler in 2026. Under his "Juche" ideology, the state maintains total control over every aspect of life.

  • The Crimes: He operates a network of political prison camps (Kwanliso) where forced labor and systematic starvation are used as punishment. In 2026, his regime has expanded "shoot-to-kill" border policies to prevent any information or people from leaving.

  • Wikipedia: Kim Jong Un


2. Ali Khamenei (Iran)

As the Supreme Leader, Khamenei oversees a theocratic system that has intensified its crackdown following massive nationwide protests in early 2026.

  • The Crimes: Iranian security forces (IRGC) have been documented using battlefield weapons against civilian protesters. HRW reports a massive spike in "shadow executions" and the use of sexual violence in prisons to extract confessions from activists.

  • Wikipedia: Ali Khamenei


3. Xi Jinping (China)

Xi Jinping has solidified his lifelong rule, turning China into the world's most advanced surveillance state.

  • The Crimes: His government continues the systematic "re-education" and forced labor of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang. In 2026, the "Social Credit System" is being used to prevent dissenters from accessing public transport, healthcare, or employment.

  • Wikipedia: Xi Jinping


4. Donald Trump (United States)

In 2026, the United States has been downgraded by the V-Dem Institute to an "electoral autocracy" following the second year of Donald Trump's return to the White House.

  • The Crimes: Watchdogs have highlighted the use of federal agents in unmarked gear to suppress domestic protests and the "weaponization" of the Justice Department to target political rivals. International critics point to the 2026 "Trump Corollary," which has led to unilateral military actions in Latin America and the suspension of environmental health costs.

  • Wikipedia: Donald Trump


5. Vladimir Putin (Russia)

Following the "election" of 2024, Putin has transitioned Russia into a full-scale war economy in 2026.

  • The Crimes: Beyond the war in Ukraine, Putin’s domestic regime has criminalized all forms of dissent. Extra-judicial killings of journalists abroad and the use of "ghost houses" (secret prisons) for anti-war activists have become standard practice.

  • Wikipedia: Vladimir Putin


6. Isaias Afwerki (Eritrea)

Known as the "Dictator of the Horn," Afwerki has ruled without a constitution or elections for over three decades.

  • The Crimes: He enforces a system of indefinite national service that the UN calls "state-sponsored slavery." In 2026, those who flee his military are hunted down, and their families are often imprisoned or fined in an "extortion" system.

  • Wikipedia: Isaias Afwerki


7. Min Aung Hlaing (Myanmar)

As the head of the military junta, General Min Aung Hlaing has overseen a bloody civil war since the 2021 coup.

  • The Crimes: The military uses "Scorched Earth" tactics, burning entire villages and using airstrikes on civilian hospitals. In 2026, the regime has blocked international aid to opposition-held areas, using starvation as a weapon of war.

  • Wikipedia: Min Aung Hlaing


8. Nayib Bukele (El Salvador)

Once a "populist darling," Bukele has become a textbook case of "Democratic Backsliding" in 2026.

  • The Crimes: Under a permanent "State of Exception," he has imprisoned over 2% of his country's adult population. Reports of mass torture inside the CECOT (Mega-prison) and the complete disappearance of the rule of law have led to El Salvador being labeled a "Prison State."

  • Wikipedia: Nayib Bukele


9. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi (Egypt)

Sisi has maintained a "Permanent State of Emergency" in Egypt through 2026.

  • The Crimes: Tens of thousands of political prisoners remain in Egypt’s desert prisons. Torture—including electric shocks and "stress positions"—is documented as being used routinely by the National Security Agency (NSA) to silence bloggers and human rights lawyers.

  • Wikipedia: Abdel Fattah el-Sisi


10. Mohammed bin Salman (Saudi Arabia)

The Crown Prince, or MBS, has combined massive economic reform with absolute political repression in 2026.

  • The Crimes: The regime uses "Death Sentences for Tweets" to crush any online criticism. In 2026, Saudi border guards have been accused of using lethal force against African migrants, while domestic dissenters are frequently "disappeared" into secret detention centers.

  • Wikipedia: Mohammed bin Salman


Analysis: The Rise of "Hybrid Authoritarianism"

The 2026 landscape shows that being "oppressive" no longer requires a military uniform. Whether through the technological surveillance of Xi Jinping or the institutional deconstruction seen in the United States, modern rulers are increasingly using the laws of their own countries to target minorities and political enemies. The "essence" of this era is that the line between a "protecting" government and a "persecuting" government has become dangerously thin.

Read more…

In 2026, the global political lens is fixed on Dhaka. The transformation of Bangladesh from a 15-year "one-party" rule under Sheikh Hasina to an interim government led by Nobel Laureate Dr. Muhammad Yunus is being called the "Second Independence" by some and a "Constitutional Crisis" by others.

We explore the 2026 Bangladesh power shift: Analyzing Dr. Yunus’s backers (CIA/Mossad), China’s port strategy, and the rising reports of minority persecution.

🚩 Main Focus 

  • Was the CIA involved in the 2024 July Revolution?

  • Evidence for and against Mossad’s role in Bangladesh.

  • The Persecution of Hindus and Minorities: What the 2026 data shows.

The New Bangladesh: Dr. Yunus and the Interim Experiment

On August 8, 2024, Dr. Muhammad Yunus was sworn in as the Chief Adviser of Bangladesh. Unlike a typical Prime Minister, Yunus does not lead a political party. He leads a "Technocratic Government" made up of retired generals, student leaders, and civil society experts.

As we move through 2026, his government is tasked with "cleaning the house"—rewriting the constitution, fixing a broken police force, and preparing for national elections now scheduled for February 2026. But in the world of politics, no one stands alone. Every leader has backers, and every change of power has "ghosts" in the machine.

1. The United States and the CIA

The Argument FOR: It is no secret that Dr. Yunus has been a "darling" of the American establishment for decades. He is close friends with the Clintons and has received the highest U.S. civilian honors. Critics of the new regime point to the fact that the U.S. State Department was very vocal against Sheikh Hasina’s "flawed" elections in early 2024. Many believe the CIA provided "digital support" to the student protesters, helping them organize via encrypted apps to bypass government internet blackouts.

The Argument AGAINST: The U.S. government maintains that its support is for democracy, not a specific person. Supporters argue that the 2024 "July Revolution" was a purely organic movement led by Gen Z students who were tired of high unemployment and zero freedom of speech. They argue that if the CIA were involved, the transition would have been much smoother, rather than the chaotic power vacuum that followed Hasina’s sudden flight to India.

2. Israel and the Mossad

The Argument FOR: As we discussed in previous reports, rumors of meetings between Bangladeshi figures and Israeli agents (like Mendi Safadi) have persisted. In 2026, conspiracy theorists claim that Israel wants a "secular tech-friendly" government in Dhaka to counter the influence of radical groups. They suggest Mossad provided "cyber-intelligence" to help protesters track the movements of the Awami League's student wing (the Chhatra League).

The Argument AGAINST: There is almost zero hard evidence connecting Dr. Yunus himself to Israel. In fact, Dr. Yunus has been a vocal supporter of the Palestinian cause his entire life. Bangladesh remains one of the few countries with no diplomatic ties to Israel. Experts argue that "Mossad" is often used as a "boogeyman" in South Asian politics to discredit leaders without needing proof.

3. The China Factor

The Argument FOR: In a surprising twist in 2026, Dr. Yunus has made China his first major state visit. He has moved to give China control of the Mongla Port and is seeking billions in Chinese investment to replace Indian credit lines. Analysts suggest that Beijing saw an opportunity to "flip" Bangladesh away from India's sphere of influence and supported the interim government to secure its "String of Pearls" maritime strategy.

The Argument AGAINST: China was actually a very close partner of the previous Hasina regime. Beijing generally dislikes "street revolutions" because they fear it might inspire their own people. The current "tilt" toward China is likely a move of economic survival for Bangladesh, rather than a secret intelligence plot.

Section 2: The Dark Side — Persecution and "Mob Justice"

While the world celebrates the "New Bangladesh," there is a darker reality on the ground in 2026 that professional analysts must acknowledge.

1. The Persecution of the "Old Guard"

Since August 2024, the former ruling party, the Awami League, has been virtually dismantled.

  • Mass Arrests: Thousands of members, from high-ranking ministers to local ward leaders, are in jail. Human Rights Watch (HRW) has raised alarms about "blanket murder cases" where hundreds of people are named in a single police report for a single death.

  • Mob Justice: In 2025 and 2026, reports have surfaced of "lynching" and public humiliations of former officials. The Yunus government has been criticized for being "too slow" to stop these mobs, leading to accusations that they are allowing "revenge politics" to replace the rule of law.

2. The Plight of Minorities

The most sensitive issue in 2026 is the treatment of religious minorities, specifically the Hindu community.

  • Targeted Attacks: During the chaos of the transition, hundreds of Hindu homes and temples were attacked. While the government claims these attacks were "political" (because many Hindus supported the previous regime), the fear in the community is real. 

  • The Chinmoy Das Case: The arrest of Hindu leader Chinmoy Krishna Das on sedition charges sparked international protests. Critics say the interim government is "turning a blind eye" to the rising influence of radical groups like Hizb ut-Tahrir and Jamaat-e-Islami, who are filling the power vacuum left by the Awami League.

Section 3: Conclusion — The Essence of the Yunus Era

The essence of the Yunus government in 2026 can be summed up in one word: Fragility.

Dr. Yunus is currently walking a tightrope. On one side, he is hailed as a global hero trying to build a "civilized" democracy. On the other, he is presiding over a country where the police are still afraid to walk the streets and where "revenge" has become a common political currency.

The Reality Check:

  • If Yunus succeeds in holding a fair election in February 2026, he will go down as the man who saved Bangladesh.

  • If he fails to stop the persecution of minorities and the "old guard," he risks becoming the face of a new kind of "inclusive authoritarianism" where only those who "agree with the revolution" are safe.

The "Backers" (USA, China, etc.) are all watching. They aren't backing Yunus because they love him; they are backing him because they want a piece of the Bay of Bengal. In 2026, Bangladesh is no longer a "basket case"—it is a prize.

Read more…

The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) is a leading force in the fight for human rights and social justice. Utilizing creative legal strategies, CCR challenges government and corporate abuse, ensuring that constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected for all citizens.

From fighting Mass Incarceration and Racial Injustice to protecting LGBTQI rights and demanding accountability for Guantanamo and Torture, War Crimes, & Militarism, CCR litigates landmark cases that transform legal and political systems. Follow CCR's work to stay informed about your rights and how they are working to secure justice and systemic change across America.

The official website for the Center for Constitutional Rights is: ccrjustice.org

Read more…
Yaqeen Social™ is currently in beta/invite only. We're legit still building, so expect a few bugs or occasional data hiccups.

Partner Ad



⚙️ Privacy & Security · Investor Relations · Partnerships · Media Kit · How Yaqeen Works · Roadmap