In January 2026, the global cricket community was rocked when the BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India) ordered the Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) to release Bangladeshi star Mustafizur Rahman just weeks after they bought him for a record ₹9.20 crore ($1.1M).
This move wasn't about "bad form" or injuries—it was about using a professional athlete to send a political message. Following unrest in Bangladesh, right-wing political groups in India pressured the board to "punish" the neighboring country by banning its players. For conscious activists, this is the clearest example yet of how India’s massive wealth is being used to bully smaller nations and turn a global sport into a political weapon.
Soft Power, Hard Borders: The Weaponization of Global Cricket
The saga began when the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) instructed the Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) to release Mustafizur Rahman from his contract. The official reason cited "recent developments," but the reality was a campaign led by right-wing political figures.
Politicians from India’s ruling party openly labeled the hiring of a Bangladeshi player as "anti-national," citing unrest in Bangladesh as a reason to punish its athletes.5 This move effectively turned a professional athlete into a political hostage, signaling to the world that playing in the IPL requires more than just skill—it requires political clearance from New Delhi.
The "Big Brother" Playbook: A History of Bullying
Mustafizur is simply the latest "collateral damage" in a long-standing pattern of the BCCI wielding its 80% contribution to global cricket revenue to silence smaller nations and dictate ICC policy.
-
The "Lorgat" Retribution (2013): When Cricket South Africa (CSA) appointed Haroon Lorgat as CEO—a man who had stood up to India’s dominance at the ICC—the BCCI retaliated by unilaterally cutting a lucrative Indian tour of South Africa by half, costing the CSA millions in revenue.
-
The Revenue Grab: In 2023, India secured a nearly 40% share of all ICC net surplus revenue, leaving the other 100+ nations to split the remainder.8 Critics argue this "monoculture" prevents the sport from growing in developing nations. Â
-
The Pakistan Embargo: India’s refusal to play bilateral series with Pakistan, and its use of "Hybrid Models" to force tournaments like the Asia Cup out of Pakistan, shows how the BCCI uses the sport to enforce state-level diplomatic boycotts.
Conscious Activist Alert: Why This Matters
For those advocating for fair play and the separation of sport from majoritarian politics, the Mustafizur saga is a warning. When a single board holds the "kill switch" for a player’s career based on their nationality or religion, cricket ceases to be a "gentleman’s game" and becomes a tool of geopolitical coercion.
The reaction from Dhaka has been swift: a total ban on IPL broadcasts in Bangladesh and a threat to boycott the 2026 T20 World Cup matches scheduled in India.9 This cycle of "cricket sanctions" threatens to turn the sport into a series of isolated bubbles governed by whoever has the biggest checkbook.
The Future of the Game
If one country can decide who gets to play based on their religion or passport, cricket is no longer a world sport—it’s a private club. Activists are now calling for the ICC to be moved out of Dubai and stripped of Indian influence to ensure that the "Gentleman’s Game" doesn't become a tool for "Majoritarian Bullying."
Â
Comments