Advertisement


Yaqeen Social is a project of YaqeenOnline.com

migrants (2)

For countless individuals, the journey through the US immigration system ends in a stark, concrete riverbed just south of the border: El Bordo. This dry channel in Tijuana, where the Tijuana River once flowed, has become a makeshift shantytown—a devastating symbol of broken American dreams and the failure of reintegration policies.

Today, El Bordo and the surrounding shelters are once again overwhelmed. Following the US administration’s acceleration of mass deportations and the shuttering of key asylum pathways like the CBP One app in early 2025, Tijuana has become a critical choke point, trapping thousands of people in a painful limbo between two countries.


The Anatomy of the Deportee Crisis

Around 40% of all Mexican immigrants deported from the US are sent back through Tijuana. These are not new arrivals; they are often men and women who lived, worked, and paid taxes in the US for decades, many unable to speak Spanish and torn abruptly from American families.

  • The Identity Crisis: Many deportees have no familial or financial ties to Mexico. They remain in Tijuana, gazing at the lights of San Diego, desperate to maintain contact with their children left behind in the US.

  • Economic Exclusion: Without proper Mexican identification, finding formal work is nearly impossible. Many are forced into the informal economy or find precarious jobs in call centers—ironically, answering calls from the same American consumers they were just removed from serving.

  • The Shelter Divide: While the Mexican government has opened temporary shelters, many deportees choose the perilous conditions of the streets or informal camps over the crowded, autonomous-free environment of the facilities.


El Bordo and the New Policy Reality

El Bordo, while a permanent fixture, sees its population fluctuate violently based on US policy. Recent actions have tightened the noose on those seeking refuge:

  • Asylum Denial: The expansion of expedited removal policies means individuals arriving at ports of entry can be swiftly deported, effectively blocking asylum for many fleeing violence in Central and South America.

  • The Return to "Remain in Mexico": The threat of reinstating the "Remain in Mexico" program forces non-Mexican asylum seekers to wait in dangerous border cities, exposed to organized crime and kidnapping.

  • The Environmental Risk: Living in the riverbed exposes residents to harsh environmental conditions, including constant sewage contamination and the danger of flash flooding during the rainy season.


The Human Toll: Trauma and Survival

For the thousands stranded in Tijuana, the challenges go far beyond shelter and work; they are fundamentally psychological.

The experience of deportation creates immense emotional distress, exacerbating anxiety and depression. Deportees, stripped of their social networks and legal status, are highly vulnerable to exploitation by local criminal organizations.

Despite the monumental institutional failures on both sides of the border, the community survives through grassroots solidarity. Local NGOs and church-run shelters provide critical humanitarian aid, serving as the only lifeline against the constant threat of violence, hunger, and the crushing weight of isolation.

The deportee slums of Tijuana are not just a geographical problem; they are a direct consequence of policies that prioritize enforcement over human dignity, leaving broken lives to struggle in a perilous, concrete limbo.


Sources

◦ Latin American Immigration Association - U.S. Immigration Policy Changes (July 2025)

◦ Migration Policy Institute (MPI) - New Era of Immigration Enforcement under Trump 2.0

◦ KPBS Public Media - New Tijuana Shelter Ready for Deportees (Jan 2025)

◦ National Geographic - In Tijuana, Deportees Struggle to Find 'Home'

Read more…

1. Details of the Report and the Warning

The warning about "millions" originated from an analysis that found a large segment of the population is legally vulnerable to having their citizenship revoked.

  • The Estimated Figure (The "Millions"):

    • Analysis by the New Statesman (December 2021) estimated that nearly six million people in England and Wales could be eligible for deprivation of citizenship.

    • This vulnerability applies to any British citizen who is, or is considered to be, eligible for citizenship in another country (e.g., through birthright or descent).

  • The Disproportionate Impact on Muslims:

    • Reports argue that the powers are implemented almost exclusively against British Muslims, particularly those of South Asian, Middle Eastern, or North African heritage.

    • The Muslim Census noted that while Muslims are approximately 5 percent of the UK population, they represent over a quarter of the 5.6 million people identified as potentially eligible for citizenship deprivation.

    • The key criticism is that these laws create a two-tiered system of citizenship, where citizens of minority ethnic backgrounds have a "second-class, disposable, contingent citizenship."

 

2. The Legislation (The Cause)

The primary concern is the Home Secretary's power under Section 40 of the British Nationality Act 1981, which allows citizenship to be stripped if it is deemed "conducive to the public good."

The controversy intensified with the passage of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, which made two key changes:

  1. Removal of the Notice Requirement: The Act allows the Home Secretary to make a deprivation order without giving prior written notice to the individual in "exceptional circumstances."

  2. Latest Legal Change (October 2025): The Deprivation of Citizenship Orders (Effect during Appeal) Act 2025 was passed. This law means that if a person who was stripped of their citizenship successfully wins an initial appeal, their British citizenship is no longer automatically reinstated if the government intends to pursue further appeals.

 💥 Consequences of UK Citizenship Deprivation Powers

The extended powers under the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 have far-reaching consequences, particularly for minority communities:

1. "Second-Class" Citizenship Status

  • Detail: Critics argue the legislation signals that minority citizens are not considered "true" citizens in the same way as those with only British nationality.

  • Impact: Reduces their citizenship to a privilege that can be revoked rather than an absolute right, fundamentally altering their legal standing.

2. Risk of Exile and Difficulty of Appeal

  • Detail: Deprivation orders are often served when individuals are overseas.

  • Impact: This effectively exiles them and makes it extremely difficult to access legal aid, contest the decision, or return to the UK for their appeal hearing.

3. Mental and Community Impact

  • Detail: The persistent, existential threat of losing citizenship has an immediate effect on vulnerable communities.

  • Impact: It has been linked to increased fear, anxiety, a feeling of alienation, and prompting some individuals to consider leaving the country.

4. Legal Precedent (The 2025 Act)

  • Detail: The Deprivation of Citizenship Orders (Effect during Appeal) Act 2025 states that a citizen's status is not automatically restored, even if they win their initial appeal.

  • Impact: The individual's life remains in limbo. They can be detained or barred from re-entry while the Home Office pursues further legal challenges, extending the period of legal uncertainty.

Read more…
Yaqeen Social™ is currently in beta/invite only. We're legit still building, so expect a few bugs or occasional data hiccups.