In January 2026, the intersection of world football and geopolitical morality has reached a boiling point. As the death toll in Gaza surpasses 71,000, according to the latest health reports, a massive wave of condemnation has hit the doorsteps of UEFA and FIFA.
The flashpoint of this latest outrage is the tragic death of Suleiman Al-Obeid, known affectionately as the "Palestinian Pelé," and the subsequent silence from European football’s governing body regarding the circumstances of his killing.
The Silence of the Pitch: The Killing of Suleiman Al-Obeid
On January 1, 2026, the Palestine Football Association (PFA) confirmed that 41-year-old Suleiman Al-Obeid—a legendary former national team striker with over 100 career goals—was killed in an Israeli attack in the southern Gaza Strip.
The detail that has ignited global fury is the context: Obeid was reportedly waiting for humanitarian aid at a distribution point when he was struck. His death adds to a staggering toll within the sporting community; the PFA now estimates that over 800 Palestinian athletes and sports staff have been killed since October 2023, including 421 football players, nearly half of whom were children.
Salah’s Direct Challenge to UEFA
When UEFA released a brief, sanitized tribute on X (formerly Twitter) calling Al-Obeid a "talent who gave hope to children," they conspicuously omitted any mention of how he died. Mohamed Salah, the Liverpool and Egypt icon, broke the silence of the football elite by quoting the post with a searing three-word demand:
Salah’s intervention highlights a growing frustration with what many see as the "neutrality of the oppressor"—the refusal of Western sporting bodies to acknowledge the source of the violence while reaping the social capital of a "tribute."
The Legal Precedent: Why No Ban for Israel?
The primary legal and ethical argument for a ban on Israel rests on the Russia Precedent. In 2022, within days of the invasion of Ukraine, UEFA and FIFA suspended Russia and all Russian clubs from international competition, citing "safety and security" and the "promotion of peace."
The Current Legal Stalemate:
-
UEFA Status Violations: Legal experts and several Member Associations (including the Republic of Ireland, Turkey, and Norway) have argued that Israel is in violation of Article 2 of the UEFA Statutes. This involves the playing of Israeli club matches in occupied Palestinian territories without the consent of the PFA—a direct parallel to the reason Russia was sanctioned when it attempted to integrate Crimean clubs.
-
The "Safety" Argument: UEFA has maintained that matches cannot be played on Israeli soil due to security risks, yet they have resisted a full ban, allowing Israel to play "home" games in neutral venues like Hungary or Italy.
-
The Humanitarian Crisis: As of January 2026, the UN’s World Food Programme reports that 1.6 million Gazans (77% of the population) face catastrophic food insecurity, with 500,000 on the literal brink of starvation. Critics argue that supporting a nation under investigation for genocide (at the ICJ) while it uses starvation as a weapon of war is a violation of the "spirit of football" that UEFA claims to uphold.
A Crisis Beyond History: The "Holocaust of Gaza"
The language used by activists and even some diplomats has shifted into the realm of historical comparison. Advocates for a ban point out that while the Holocaust remains a unique and singular horror in human history, the systematic starvation and high-density bombardment of Gaza in 2024-2026 represent a modern atrocity of a different, yet equally devastating, scale.
The "International and Muslim media" have been accused of a selective silence. While headlines occasionally flicker with death tolls, the granular reality—that children are dying of hypothermia in tents and grandfathers like Al-Obeid are being killed while queuing for flour—has become "normalized" in the news cycle. The lack of a unified, sustained media pressure from the Muslim world's largest outlets has allowed Western sporting bodies like UEFA to maintain a "business as usual" approach for nearly 28 months.
What Happens Next?
UEFA’s Executive Committee is facing internal revolt. The Football Association of Ireland (FAI) recently passed a motion (74/7) demanding a full ban on Israeli teams. With Spain threatening to boycott the 2026 World Cup if Israel is allowed to participate, the governing bodies are trapped between the legal precedent they set with Russia and the intense geopolitical pressure to remain silent on Gaza.
The death of the "Palestinian Pelé" has served as a diagnostic tool for the world: it shows that in the arena of global power, the life of a footballer is only worth acknowledging if his killer is not an ally.
Comments